Asia remains a high-growth region led by two of its largest emerging economies, China and India. Both countries are expected to contribute about half of global growth in 2023. Singly, either one of these dominant markets offers a range of investment opportunities; but together, their complementary strengths reveal a deeper and wider pool of stock choices.
China is already a major economic powerhouse, having grown at around 9% per year since it began to reform its economy in 1978. Recognising that its high-growth model based on investments, lowcost manufacturing and exports has mostly reached its limits, the government is accelerating the pivot towards domestic consumption and innovation to sustain long-term economic development.
On the other hand, India is still a rising economic power. As its development model focused on domestic demand and services, India’s growth has been more moderate than China. Nevertheless, it is now the fastest-growing economy in the world and has reached a stage where it is too big to ignore. To add, it is the world’s most populous country with one of the largest percentages of working age population.
On a standalone basis, these Asian giants already offer plenty of diverse investment opportunities. However, given that both are at a different stage of economic growth and development, their investment universes differ. As such, investors who would like to get exposure to the biggest emerging economies in Asia can gain more from the combined and complementary strengths of China and India.
Expanding opportunity set
Within the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) index, the weights of China and India have grown to 28.7% and 14.5% respectively as of May 2023. Ten years ago, their combined weight was only 26% (see Chart 1). Likewise, within the MSCI Asia exJapan index, they make up almost half the index weight. The rising dominance of China and India in the indices is a result of their rapid economic progress. We expect their combined weight in regional indices to continue its uptrend in the medium term, driven by further A-share inclusion (China) and more initial public offerings (IPOs) in both markets.
See also: US equities, IG, fixed income strategies, gold and copper among top investment picks: UBS
A supportive regulatory environment is also underpinning Chinese and Indian capital markets. Over the years, India’s capital markets regulator, Sebi, has undertaken several enhancements. Its latest proposal to reduce timelines for IPOs to three days from the six days at present, when implemented, will benefit issuers and investors. Likewise, earlier in the year, China relaxed the rules for IPO listings which will speed up listings and corporate fundraising.
Distinct sector strengths
See also: With Trump win boosting stocks, investors hunt for next winners
Another reason to invest in both markets is the opportunity to pick out the best ideas across a diversified range of sectors. The consumer discretionary sector has the highest weight in the MSCI China index, while the financial sector is the largest in the MSCI India index (see Chart 2). China’s consumer discretionary market is among the largest in the world and highly diversified into the retail, e-commerce, travel and luxury segments. On the other hand, India is the topmost offshoring destination for global information technology (IT) companies; the IT sector is expected to contribute 10% of GDP by 2025.
Even within the same sector, the companies are distinct, which allows active investors to maximise the stock-picking diversity and focus on the best ideas. China’s banking sector is dominated by policy-driven state-owned enterprises, while it is the private banks in India that are gaining market share from their state-owned counterparts.
The property sector is yet another example of this contrast. China faces an extended downcycle, while India appears to be at the initial stage of a multi-year upcycle. Within healthcare, China’s big pharma companies are experiencing persistent price cuts domestically, while India’s generic pharma manufacturers are fast diversifying from the challenging US generic market into new verticals such as innovative drugs.
Capitalising on differences
Having been the world’s factory for the past few decades, China is now transitioning to higher-quality growth and moving up the manufacturing value chain with a focus on innovation and higher-end equipment and industrial goods. Meanwhile, India, which has been well-known for being the world’s back office, is now establishing an additional pillar of growth in manufacturing by accelerating its infrastructure build-out and upskilling talents. This coincides with several multinationals’ “China plus-one” strategy. Data from US-based Reshoring Institute indicates that India is among the lowest-cost manufacturing hubs along with Mexico and Vietnam.
Likewise, the consumer sector is another clear example of the differences that can be exploited. Although India has pipped China to become the world’s most populous nation, the country’s consumer class (defined as those spending more than US$12 a day in 2017) is only half of China’s. However, China’s consumers are older and mostly live in cities. In contrast, India is on track to become the world’s biggest youth consumer market by 2030; yet the consumer class is both urban and rural. Consumption patterns, which are usually dictated by affordability and lifestyle preferences, will differ in both markets.
For more stories about where money flows, click here for Capital Section
By investing in both markets, one will gain exposure to a wider spectrum of companies; their complementary nature implies investors get the best of both worlds.
Investment rationale
One could argue that investing in only China and India offers narrow diversification benefits. As both markets already form a big part of the MSCI EM and MSCI Asia ex-Japan indices, investing in a broader emerging-market or Asia strategy not only offers meaningful exposure to these markets but also diversification benefits from other countries. True, but whether such regional diversification dilutes one’s return is worth considering. Interestingly, empirical data reveals that a combined 50-50 China-India portfolio has outperformed the regional indices over the past eight years.
It is also encouraging to note the decreasing correlation between the two countries across multiple fronts — market performance, macro, and foreign flows (see Chart 4). Differing valuations are an additional aspect; China is still cheap at one standard deviation below its 20-year average on a price-to-book basis, while India is trading just above its average. The contrasting valuations offer active investors a dynamic pool of stocks to capitalise on mispriced opportunities in each market.
All in, a combined China-India approach has its unique counter-cyclical benefits, providing a positive backdrop for bottom-up stock-pickers through market cycles.
Yuan Yiu Tsai is portfolio manager at Eastspring Investments
