Continue reading this on our app for a better experience

Open in App
Floating Button
Home News Company in the news

Wilmar unit denies involvement in alleged China palm oil fraud

Bloomberg
Bloomberg • 2 min read
Wilmar unit denies involvement in alleged China palm oil fraud
Photo: Bloomberg
Font Resizer
Share to Whatsapp
Share to Facebook
Share to LinkedIn
Scroll to top
Follow us on Facebook and join our Telegram channel for the latest updates.

A Chinese subsidiary of Asian food giant Wilmar International F34

has denied allegations by a city prosecution agency that one of its units was partially accountable for a trade fraud that led to a 5.2 billion yuan (US$725 million) loss for a state-owned company.

Wilmar’s Yihai Kerry Arawana Holdings Co said in an exchange filing Friday that one of its units had been sued in the eastern province of Anhui over its alleged role in loss-making palm oil trades between a state-owned trader and a privately owned counterparty. The company, one of China’s top food processors, said it wasn’t involved in the fraud.

Chinese commodity trading has been hit by a series of scandals in recent years, including cases where fraudulent financial documents and warehouse receipts were used as proof of collateral and credit. The filing by the unit of Singapore-listed Wilmar, co-founded by billionaire Kuok Khoon Hong, gives a rare insight into commodity trading in the world’s largest consumer.

The case focuses on state-owned trader Anhui Whywin International Co and its palm oil deals with private feed trader Yunnan Huijia Import & Export Co, according to the indictment cited in the filing. The prosecutor alleges that Huijia used forged documents to obtain palm oil deliveries from Whywin, without paying the full amounts, the indictment said. The prosecutor alleges that the Yihai Kerry unit was also involved in the case. 

Yihai Kerry said all transactions conducted by its Guangzhou unit in the trades were in compliance with normal practices and contractual agreements. The company did not obtain any improper benefit from Huijia, nor did it participate in the alleged fraud against Whywin, according to the filing.

×
The Edge Singapore
Download The Edge Singapore App
Google playApple store play
Keep updated
Follow our social media
© 2024 The Edge Publishing Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.