In my career over the past 20-plus years, there have been two major lessons investing in Chinese companies. The first is to focus on bottom-up analysis and hold on to quality companies. Sentiment could turn extremely positive or negative, which I experienced first-hand during the Asian Financial Crisis in the late 1990s, the bursting of the tech bubble in the early 2000s, and the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2008. But the key driver of share prices over the long term is the ability of companies to generate value, by growing their earnings or net asset value.
The second lesson is to remain disciplined and not be carried away by greed or fear. I have seen the same market trade at 60x P/E and 5x P/E. This means when the market is fearful, we need to be more courageous, and when the market is irrationally bullish, we should tread carefully.
Going against the crowd can be difficult, especially in this environment with steep interest rate hikes in the US, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, weakness in the Chinese property sector and rolling Covid lockdowns. We are not macro investors, nor can we predict how such events will play out. But while every crisis is different, the ingredients are often the same — they all relate to human nature.
The chart “Where are we in the cycle?” helps to put things in perspective. As we reflect on the prevailing emotions around Chinese stocks over the past year, we appeared to be closer to the bottom than the top. Therefore, we have added to our high conviction core holdings.
Focus on quality as bottom-up investors
See also: Key issues Khazanah-led consortium will have to fix at MAHB post-privatisation
Somewhat unique to our investment process is the amount of time we spend meeting with management teams — we hold more than 1,500 meetings a year. Rather than build complex financial models, we try to gain conviction around a company’s competitive moat, sustainability of earnings growth, and the management’s integrity. An acid test of our conviction is whether we would buy more of a stock if the price halves.
Amid the recent headwinds, we have continued to meet with companies to see how they adapt. We believe the best companies tend to emerge stronger from setbacks, as we saw with China Mengniu Dairy following the 2008 melamine scandal, or Techtronic after the US housing market crashed during the GFC.
Our focus on quality also helps to avoid losses. If the management is not honest, they will find ways to take advantage of minority shareholders. China has given us plenty of scandals, as in the case of Chaoda Modern Agriculture, Gome, Luckin Coffee and, more recently, Evergrande. These incidents all point to a lack of integrity, in the form of fraudulent financials, insider trading, or bribery. To form a clear assessment in our company meetings, we also read between the lines and observe the nuances of their culture. Is there a domineering leader? Do they treat their employees well, and care about the broader society? We view any mistreatment of other stakeholders as a clear red flag.
See also: Developing countries can't count on manufacturing to supercharge growth
Keep a long-term horizon
We believe the growth in company earnings is what ultimately drives share prices over the long term. One needs both patience and conviction to reap such rewards, so when we add a stock to the portfolio, we hold on to it for the long term. All of our top 10 holdings have been in the portfolio for more than 10 years. As the adage goes, “It’s not about timing the market, but time in the market.”
For example, after China Merchants Bank (CMB) listed in Hong Kong in 2006, the share price went nowhere for a number of years. Headwinds included the GFC and concerns around non-performing loans. But despite these concerns, CMB’s earnings have risen and so has the stock price, performing better than most Chinese banks over the long term. This is largely due to CMB’s track record of prudent risk management and organic growth in assets without the need for outside capital. Recently, we have added to our holdings amid attractive valuations.
Similarly, we have been shareholders of Tencent since 2005, and it has performed well over the long term. We have always found the management to be stable and down to earth. They have consistently focussed on user experience and executed better than their peers, building up strong moats through major apps like WeChat. While the company is unlikely to repeat its past growth due to its sheer size, we expect it will achieve 10%–15% sales growth per annum in the coming 3–5 years, given the potential to monetise its existing apps. Therefore, we saw the recent pessimism as a buying opportunity.
Maintain valuation discipline
For more stories about where money flows, click here for Capital Section
Besides our focus on quality and investing for the long term, valuation discipline has always been part of our investment philosophy. Maintaining this discipline can be difficult in practice, but it helps that the team has experienced various cycles and seen the market rebound from extreme pessimism. In hindsight, the best buying opportunities usually arose when the economy was at its worst, like during SARS in 2003.
As investors, part of our job is to consider opposing views to the crowd. In the property sector, for instance, the prevailing negative sentiment is constraining new investments and supply, which means new opportunities could arise as demand catches up.
Another example is China’s “common prosperity” agenda, which has raised the regulatory standards in sectors like education, Internet, healthcare and property.
We think share prices have factored in these challenges; in fact the regulations can help these industries improve. Companies will need to be more disciplined with spending, and the ones with stronger franchises should gain market share.
The other side of valuation discipline is avoiding hot, crowded areas of the market. Given our team’s experience, we are naturally cautious and sceptical. Some people may see this as a drawback, but we believe this conservative attitude has saved us more often than not. For example, we avoided loss-making Internet and electric vehicle companies, which meant missing out on gains during ebullient periods, but conversely protecting our capital when the market sentiment turned.
Conclusion
China has always been opaque in areas like policy-making, which can lead to big surprises and market volatility. Whether we have seen the bottom or not will only become clear in hindsight. Until then, we continue adhering to our investment discipline by focussing on quality, keeping a long-term horizon, and constantly challenging one another, lest we get carried away by our own greed and fear.
Martin Lau is managing partner and lead portfolio manager of FSSA China Growth
